Abstract
Analysis of a recent constitutional lawsuit by religious doctors against the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario. When a doctor refuses to offer medical assistance in dying for religious or conscientious reasons, the College requires the objector to give the patient an effective so that the patient can receive the procedure from another accessible doctor. The religious doctors say that the College's forced referral has unjustifiably taken away their religious freedom under the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. I argue that the College's approach is justifiable under the Charter, but should still be revised to better accommodate religious freedom.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
