Abstract

After a period when everything seemed to come up trumps, Renault has fallen on hard times again. Since the 1980s, the company has run into serious difficulties once every decade: 1983–6, 1992–7 and 2005 to the present. Hard times have sometimes been followed by a spectacular recovery, as when Renault first set up its alliance with Nissan, or made Dacia into the world’s first truly ‘low-cost’ automobile maker, or penetrated the Korean market by taking over Samsung. Of course, there were dissimilarities between these three times of trouble. The first was caused by a crisis endangering Renault’s very financial survival. The second resulted from a performance crisis masking the decision it had made to pursue highly profitable product policies in the favourable context of the late 1990s. The gains from this move allowed Renault to ‘globalise’ in one fell swoop. Lastly, the problems encountered since 2005 seem to be rooted in a crisis of coherency that, although it may not yet be apprehended in this light, could ultimately turn into something more serious than mere ‘turbulence’.KeywordsOperating MarginPassenger VehicleConceptual InnovationAsian CrisisInnovative ModelThese keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.