Abstract
526 patients with essential hypertension or congestive cardiac failure were treated with ticrynafen (250--500 mg/day) or hydrochlorothiazide (50--100 mg/day) for 6 weeks to 6 months. There was no appreciable effect on renal function, as measured by changes in blood urea nitrogen and serum creatinine levels. Both drugs exhibited similar antihypertensive activity and ability to control signs and symptoms of congestive cardiac failure. Side effects were mild and reversible. A notable difference is the marked reduction in serum uric acid in patients treated with ticrynafen, unlike the elevated urate levels occurring after treatment with hydrochlorothiazide.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
