Abstract

BackgroundRenal dysfunction influences outcomes after pulmonary embolism (PE). We aimed to determine the incremental value of adding renal dysfunction, defined by estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), on top of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) prognostic model, for the prediction of 30-day mortality in acute PE patients, which in turn could lead to the optimization of acute PE management.MethodsWe performed a multicenter, non-interventional retrospective post hoc analysis based on a prospectively collected cohort including consecutive confirmed acute PE stratified per ESC guidelines. We first identified which of three eGFR formulae most accurately predicted death. Changes in global model fit, discrimination, calibration and reclassification parameters were evaluated with the addition of eGFR to the prognostic model.ResultsAmong 1943 patients (mean age 67.3 (17.1), 50.4% women), 107 (5.5%) had died at 30 days. The 4-variable Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (eGFRMDRD4) formula predicted death most accurately. In total, 477 patients (24.5%) had eGFRMDRD4 < 60 ml/min. Observed mortality was higher for intermediate–low-risk and high-risk PE in patients with versus without renal dysfunction. The addition of eGFRMDRD4 information improved model fit, discriminatory capacity, and calibration of the ESC model. Reclassification parameters were significantly increased, yielding 18% reclassification of predicted mortality (p < 0.001). Predicted mortality reclassifications across risk categories were as follows: 63.1% from intermediate–low risk to eGFR-defined intermediate–high risk, 15.8% from intermediate–high risk to eGFR-defined intermediate–low risk, and 21.0% from intermediate–high risk to eGFR-defined high risk. External validation in a cohort of 14,234 eligible patients from the RIETE registry confirmed our findings with a significant improvement of Harrell’s C index and reclassification parameters.ConclusionThe addition of eGFRMDRD4-derived renal dysfunction on top of the prognostic algorithm led to risk reclassification within the intermediate- and high-risk PE categories. The impact of risk stratification integrating renal dysfunction on therapeutic management for acute PE requires further studies.

Highlights

  • Renal dysfunction influences outcomes after pulmonary embolism (PE)

  • The European Society of Cardiology (ESC) guidelines for the management of PE introduced severe renal dysfunction (i.e., estimated glomerular filtration rate < 30 ml/min), which is included in the Hestia checklist, as a possible criterion to guide the choice of home treatment or hospitalization in low-risk patients [1, 7]

  • We performed an external validation of the incremental prognostic value of renal dysfunction using data from the Registro Informatizado de la Enfermedad TromboEmbólica (RIETE registry). This cohort study is a non-interventional retrospective post hoc analysis based on prospectively collected data from five French centers between September 2012 and November 2019, and recorded in the Burgundy Franche-Comte (BFC)-FRANCE registry [9]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

We aimed to determine the incremental value of adding renal dysfunction, defined by estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), on top of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) prognostic model, for the prediction of 30-day mortality in acute PE patients, which in turn could lead to the optimization of acute PE management. High-risk PE requires urgent pulmonary revascularization therapy to restore pulmonary flow and improve right ventricular (RV) function [1]. The European Society of Cardiology (ESC) guidelines for the management of PE introduced severe renal dysfunction (i.e., estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) < 30 ml/min), which is included in the Hestia checklist, as a possible criterion to guide the choice of home treatment or hospitalization in low-risk patients [1, 7]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.