Abstract

Objective: Renal denervation (DRN) is one of the invasive therapeutic approaches of resistant arterial hypertension. The aim of this study was to re-evaluate patients undergoing DRN, in terms of safety and efficacy. Design and method: A retrospective evaluation of patients undergoing DRN between 01/01/2011 and 31/12/2021 in the Arterial Hypertension Center of Turin. Results: The series included 14 subjects, of which 8 (57%) were female and with an average age 54±10 years. The number of antihypertensive drugs before renal denervation was 5.7±1.0 and at baseline the blood pressure was 188/113±22±18 mmHg. 28% of subjects had a history of ischemic heart disease and 27% of previous stroke and/or transient ischemic event. 9 subjects were denervated with Symplicity device, 1 with Vessix, 4 with Symplicity Spyral. The mean duration of follow-up was 5.2 years. From a safety point of view, there were no short-term or long-term complications. In terms of efficacy, the number of responders at 6 months, defined as a reduction of at least 10 mmHg in systolic blood pressure (PAS) at 24h Blood Pressure Monitoring, was 9 subjects (64%). Two subjects reported systolic blood pressure values below 135 mmHg. Regarding the type of device used, 75% of subjects treated with Spiral devices were responders, compared with 60% of subjects treated with other catheters. Among the non-responders, 2 presented events one year after the DRN. Only 1 responder had high level of renin at baseline. Conclusions: The data relating to the case studies of the Arterial Hypertension Center of Turin highlight the safety of the renal denervation procedure and a blood pressure response in 60% of patients. The latest generation catheters seems to be more effective. However, the small number of cases did not allow to identify predictive factors of response to DRN.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call