Abstract

BackgroundReports suggest that renal decline is greater among patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) treated chronically with warfarin vs. some non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants. Methods and resultsUsing primary care electronic health records from the United Kingdom we followed adults with NVAF and who started rivaroxaban (20 mg/day, N = 5338) or warfarin (N = 6314), excluding those with estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) <50 ml/min/1.73m2, end-stage renal disease (ESRD) or no eGFR or serum creatinine (SCr) values recorded in the previous year. Outcomes were: doubling SCr levels, ≥30% decline in eGFR and progression to ESRD. We calculated adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for each outcome. Average eGFR slope was estimated using mixed model regression. After a mean follow-up 2.5 years, the number of incident cases of adverse renal events within the two cohorts was: doubling SCr (n = 322), ≥30% decline in eGFR (n = 1179), and progression to ESRD (n = 22). Adjusted HRs (95% CIs) for the renal outcomes among rivaroxaban vs. warfarin users were: doubling SCr, 0.63 (0.49–0.81); ≥30% decline in eGFR, 0.76 (0.67–0.86); ESRD, 0.77 (0.29–2.04). Similar results were observed among patients with diabetes or heart failure. Estimated mean decline in renal function over the study period was 2.03 ml/min/1.73 m2/year among warfarin users and 1.65 ml/min/1.73 m2/year among rivaroxaban users (p = 0.03). ConclusionsWe found clear evidence that patients with NVAF, preserved renal function at baseline and treated with rivaroxaban had a markedly reduced risk and rate of renal decline compared with those treated with warfarin.

Highlights

  • Reports suggest that renal decline is greater among patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) treated chronically with warfarin vs. some non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants

  • We aimed to evaluate the incidence of adverse renal outcomes among patients with NVAF with preserved renal function receiving rivaroxaban 20 mg/day or warfarin in the United Kingdom (UK) pri­ mary care setting

  • We identified a total of 11,652 patients with NVAF and preserved renal function; 5338 in the rivaroxaban 20 mg cohort and 6314 in the warfarin cohort

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Reports suggest that renal decline is greater among patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) treated chronically with warfarin vs. some non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants. Outcomes were: doubling SCr levels, ≥30% decline in eGFR and progression to ESRD. After a mean follow-up 2.5 years, the number of incident cases of adverse renal events within the two cohorts was: doubling SCr (n = 322), ≥30% decline in eGFR (n = 1179), and progression to ESRD (n = 22). Adjusted HRs (95% CIs) for the renal outcomes among rivaroxaban vs warfarin users were: doubling SCr, 0.63 (0.49–0.81); ≥30% decline in eGFR, 0.76 (0.67–0.86); ESRD, 0.77 (0.29–2.04). Conclusions: We found clear evidence that patients with NVAF, preserved renal function at baseline and treated with rivaroxaban had a markedly reduced risk and rate of renal decline compared with those treated with warfarin

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.