Abstract
Recent years have witnessed a revival of interest in Marcuse's critical theory. This can be partly ascribed to Marcuse's interdisciplinary approach to humanities and social sciences. Many of Marcuse's ideas and concepts are tacitly present in contemporary social and ecological movements. Contemporary literature on Marcuse is positively inclined to his theory while the critique of Marcuse dates back to the '70s, and remains largely unimpaired. This fact poses significant challenges to the revival of Marcuse's critical theory. This study sets out to report on current interest in Marcuse's critical theory trying to correct past injustices by responding to negative criticism. The main flaw of such criticism - as we see it - is in failing to perceive interdisciplinary character of Marcuse's critical theory. Marcuse's renaissance cannot be complete without, to use dialectical term, sublating the history of negative criticism.
Highlights
Horkheimer, Adorno and Marcuse were among prominent representatives of the Institute for Social Research
Contemporary literature on Marcuse is positively inclined to his theory while the critique of Marcuse dates back to the ‘70s, and remains largely unimpaired
It is our belief that recent social struggles and political upheavals point to the potential of Marcuse’s critical theory to offer guide to the contemporary praxis
Summary
Horkheimer, Adorno and Marcuse were among prominent representatives of the Institute for Social Research (commonly known as the Frankfurt School). They pioneered interdisciplinary approach to humanities and social sciences. In this article I respond to the main critical arguments and attempt to extricate some of Marcuse’s most progressive ideas from misinterpretations. This misconception is largely caused by critics’ unfamiliarity with the complete body of Marcuse’s works characterized by an interdisciplinary approach to the critical theory. Marcuse’s renaissance cannot be complete if the history of (flawed) criticism is about to repeat itself
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.