Abstract
The question this paper addresses is whether the corporate-governance reforms of the past 30 years have actually made our elite-remuneration problems worse. This article posits that, over time, corporate-governance initiatives have created a regulatory edifice that has neutered executives and distanced shareholders from important internal governance matters, such as remuneration, while at the same time considering disclosure of elite salaries a legitimising tool in itself. In the public sector, the mimicking of private-sector agency-cost-reducing norms and transparency initiatives has had a similar accelerating effect on the salaries of the elite. The price of this edifice in all sectors has been high elite pay, as neutered executives and public servants have sought out remuneration as a proxy for power, prestige and service. In turn, there has been a steady increase in public awareness of and unhappiness about elite remuneration. The paper concludes that the answer lies in giving executives and public servants back their discretionary power to manage, by removing many agency-cost-reducing initiatives. Real solutions are likely to be found by: ending quarterly financial disclosure; exempting public-sector salaries from Freedom of Information (FOI) requests; ceasing to use performance-related targets; reducing the influence of Non-Executive Directors (NED); increasing the cost of exit for shareholders; allowing boards to use their powers to defend takeovers; utilising average-pay ratios and employee say-on-pay rights; and removing remuneration-disclosure requirements.
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
