Removed from Context and Complexity: Women in Early AIDS Research in the South African Medical Journal, 1980–1995

Abstract

In a South African medical school in the late 2010s, future health-care professionals are told that young black women from rural areas are the drivers of HIV infection. Like AIDS narratives that have come before, this statement bluntly configures and constructs ‘women’ and reproduces, perhaps unknowingly, a patriarchal and uncritical engagement with the gendered nature of the AIDS epidemic in something akin to intellectual tunnel vision. The creation of this dominant and narrow vision began long before the AIDS epidemic; it was rooted in histories and discursive traditions of female forms repeatedly traumatised by elite medico-scientific communities. The strength of this intellectual tradition and its perpetuation is evident in articles about AIDS that appeared in the South African Medical Journal between 1980 and 1995, and are analysed in this article. In early AIDS narratives, certain women initially feature as silent sexual partners of men; ‘black’ women then appear as infecting prostitutes until attention shifts to the pregnant female form. Towards the mid 1990s, the narratives turned towards women and human rights, but, in all these representations, only certain categories of women are visible and many are completely ignored. The article reveals these silences in the medical record and explicitly notes which female forms are seen and which unseen. It explores the changing roles assigned to certain female forms as the AIDS narrative evolved and suggests that the focus on certain types of sexualities or sexual orientation were embedded in unchallenged racialised, sexist, heteronormative modes of research. Finally, the article considers how understanding the history and perpetuation of this tunnel vision could be beneficial to HIV and AIDS research and argues for the necessity of critically engaging with context and complexity in research.