Abstract

Groundwater in the north-eastern suburb of Tallinn was analysed to determine the content of iron, manganese, sulphides, ammonia, and radionuclides (Ra 226 , Ra 228 ) and total radioactivity. It was established that for several wells of the Cambrian-Vendian water layer the annual effective dose would exceed the EU guideline for drinking water (0.1 mSv/yr). The purpose was to find a technology for simultaneous purification of groundwater from iron, manganese, sulphides, ammonia, and some radionuclides (Ra 226 , Ra 228 ). A pilot plant consisting of a Venturi-type aeration unit GDT (Gas-Degas Technology, Mazzei Corp., USA), an oxidation tank, and two-stage filtration columns was constructed. Several non-catalytic (Everzit Special Plus, sand) and catalytic filter materials (Filtersorb FMH, Pyrolox) were tested. Along the flow sheet from the aerator to the II stage filter outlet the pH, dissolved oxygen and carbon dioxide, turbidity, the content of iron, manganese, and ammonia were monitored, mainly by using spectrophotometry (HACH DR/2000). Radioactivity of water samples was determined by the Estonian Radiation Centre using the liquid scintillation counting method and γ-spectrometry. It was established that by intensive aeration of groundwater followed by oxidation for a certain contact time and appropriate selection of filter materials of different properties, it was possible to remove together with iron and manganese also radium isotopes. The total effectiveness of the process was 90% removal of gross-alfa and 70% removal of gross-beta activity of groundwater. Since the uranium content in the well water was marginal and radon was almost totally (99%) removed in the degas separator, the total effective dose was calculated by Ra 226 and Ra 228 . It was about 0.067 mSv/yr, which is lower than the EU DWD guideline (0.1 mSv/yr). The theoretical assumption that radionuclides were already removed with Fe(OH)3 flocks in the first filtration step was verified by examining wash water. The radioactivity of wash water containing precipitate and the filtered wash water were measured. Results showed 4.6 times higher gross-alfa and 5.3 times higher gross-beta activity in the water containing precipitate. The co-precipitation process, where MnO2 and Fe(OH)3 flocks played an essential role, resulted in simultaneous removal of radium isotopes. Co-precipitation of radium with MnO2 was more effective than with Fe(OH)3.

Highlights

  • Groundwater in the north-eastern suburb of Tallinn was analysed to determine the content of iron, manganese, sulphides, ammonia, and radionuclides (Ra226, Ra228) and total radioactivity

  • It was established that by intensive aeration of groundwater followed by oxidation for a certain contact time and appropriate selection of filter materials of different properties, it was possible to remove together with iron and manganese radium isotopes

  • The flow sheet consisted of a pre-aeration unit GDT (Gas– Degas Technology) with an injector, an intermediate oxidation tank to provide the needed residence time for iron, and especially, for manganese oxidation, a centrifugal degas separator, and one or two filtration columns (D = 180 mm; H = 2200 mm) with different catalytic filter materials (Fig. 1)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Groundwater in the north-eastern suburb of Tallinn was analysed to determine the content of iron, manganese, sulphides, ammonia, and radionuclides (Ra226, Ra228) and total radioactivity. Since the uranium content in the well water was marginal and radon was almost totally (99%) removed in the degas separator, the total effective dose was calculated by Ra226 and Ra228. It was about 0.067 mSv/yr, which is lower than the EU DWD guideline (0.1 mSv/yr). It was established that for more than 70% of the wells in the Cambrian–Vendian water layer, the special activity index (I) was higher than 1.0 This means that the consumption of 2 L/day of water will lead to up to a 2.7 times higher effective dose than the WHO guideline of 0.1 mSv/year. Application of ion exchange is accompanied by the periodic discharge of salted radioactive regeneration solutions and reverse osmosis, and even worse – by continuous discharge of highly salted radioactive retentate (15–25% of the input)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call