Abstract

Some organisms disperse energy, associated with the transportation of resource, which is not necessarily food. Stingless bees of Central Amazonia (Melipona flavolineata and M. lateralis) collect clay in banks along streams for nest building. The moisture of the clay varies along the bank, and bees collect clay from specific location, indicating that there is some sort of preference regarding their selection. This study aims at identifying: if larger bees carry more clay; if there is a preference for moisture of substrates; and if bees are less efficient accumulating and transporting clay when it is wet. In order to do so, I measured the size of the bees and of the pellets of clay found in the corbicula. I set up a field experiment to test substrate preferences. The amount of clay transported, increased exponentially in accordance to the size of the bee, and the preferred substrate was the driest clay. The amount and the efficiency of removal of clay were not affected by the moisture of the substrate. Despite the wet clay being denser, it does not reduce the efficiency of exploitation of the resource, but suggests that bees spend more energy to carry the same quantity of wet clay, which may be the underlying mechanism explaining their preference for removing drier clay.

Highlights

  • Individuals that maximize energetic liquid gain during foraging should be favored by natural selection (Smith 2006)

  • In the presence of three treatments associated with the humidity of the substrate, the average abundance of bees was 44% higher for the treatment of dry clay when compared with control clay, and 94% higher than in wet clay (F(2,10)=27,8, p

  • The removal rate (t = 1.0, df = 36, p = 0.31, Figure 3) and the amount of clay removed by individual bees (t

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Individuals that maximize energetic liquid gain during foraging should be favored by natural selection (Smith 2006). Birds that transport food to their babies in the nest (Kacelnick 1984, Jones 1987), bees that carry pollen to the colony (Schmid-Hempel 1986), hunting-wasps that store prey in their nests (Araújo and Gonzaga 2007) and leaf-cutting ants that carry leaf fragments (Burd 2000) are all examples of organisms that have energetic costs associated to the transportation of resources In these cases the weight and the distance of the resource from the nest, the energy necessary for its transportation, the number of trips required for its transportation, and their specific experience and strength determine the load size that an individual is capable of carrying (Charnov 1976, Krebs and Davies 1993). The optimum load size would be one that maximizes energy gain of individuals and RAUL COSTA-PEREIRA minimizes the costs associated with transportation (Charnov and Orians 1973)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call