Abstract
Problem statement: To remove toxic heavy metal ions from wastewater using local sand as a low cost adsorbent. Approach: Removal efficiency of Cd(II), Cu(II), Pb(II) and Ni(II) from aqueous solution by white, yellow and red UAE sand was investigated at 25.0°C using the methods of batch equilibrium adsorption and column filtration. In each case, a mixture containing 20 ppm of each ion was employed. In the equilibrium study, the effect of sand dosage was measured for mixtures containing 20 ppm of each ion. In the column filtration study, the mixture was added to a column packed with yellow sand and the composition of the effluent was measured for each 0.050 dm3 portion. Concentrations were measured on an inductively coupled plasma-atomic emission spectrometer “ICP-AES”. Results: Removal efficiency by sand type was found to follow the order yellow>white>red. At low sand dosages, removal efficiencies of Pb(II) and Cu(II) were much higher than those for Ni(II) and Cd(II). For example, at a sand dosage of 0.02 kg dm-3, removal efficiencies of Pb(II), Cu(II), Cd(II) and Ni(II) were, respectively, 95, 86, 33 and 23% for yellow sand; 89, 86, 30 and 18% for white sand; and 75, 63, 12 and 13% for red sand. Column filtration using yellow sand confirmed that removal efficiency followed the order Pb(II)>Cu(II)>Cd(II)>Ni(II), with all four ions completely removed at mass ratios (metal/sand) lower than 3.0×10-4. Conclusion: Equilibration on sand and sand filtration are most efficient for the removal Pb(II) and Cu(II). Sand filtration can be effectively utilized to separate Pb(II) and Cu(II) from a mixture containing all four ions.
Highlights
Many industrial processes such as electroplating, galvanization, dyeing and tanning, release heavy metals into the environment
In a previous communication from this laboratory (Khamis et al, 2009), we reported on the removal and speciation of Cr(III) and Cr(VI) from wastewater using white, red and yellow United Arab Emirates (UAE) sand
Several reports deal with the use of sand as an inexpensive and efficient adsorbent of heavy metal from industrial effluents (Aslam et al, 2004; Baig et al, 2003; Muhammad et al, 1998; Awan et al, 2003) but there is only a single report (Khamis et al, 2009) on the effect of sand type on the extent of heavy metal removal
Summary
Many industrial processes such as electroplating, galvanization, dyeing and tanning, release heavy metals into the environment. The search for low cost methods to remove them is of particular significance. Some of the methods cited in the literature for removal of heavy metals include precipitation, ion exchange, adsorption, solvent extraction and biosorption. Several reports deal with the use of sand as an inexpensive and efficient adsorbent of heavy metal from industrial effluents (Aslam et al, 2004; Baig et al, 2003; Muhammad et al, 1998; Awan et al, 2003) but there is only a single report (Khamis et al, 2009) on the effect of sand type on the extent of heavy metal removal. This study aims at comparing the efficiency of the various types of UAE sand in removing cadmium, copper, lead and nickel from industrial wastewater, using equilibrium and dynamic methods
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
