Removal of Arsenic (V) from Aqueous Solutions Using Chitosan-Red Scoria and Chitosan-Pumice Blends.

Tsegaye Asere,Fekadu Fufa,Dejene Tessema,Stein Mincke,Gijs Du Laing,Christian Stevens,Kim Verbeken,Jeriffa De Clercq

doi:10.3390/ijerph14080895

Abstract

In different regions across the globe, elevated arsenic contents in the groundwater constitute a major health problem. In this work, a biopolymer chitosan has been blended with volcanic rocks (red scoria and pumice) for arsenic (V) removal. The effect of three blending ratios of chitosan and volcanic rocks (1:2, 1:5 and 1:10) on arsenic removal has been studied. The optimal blending ratio was 1:5 (chitosan: volcanic rocks) with maximum adsorption capacity of 0.72 mg/g and 0.71 mg/g for chitosan: red scoria (Ch–Rs) and chitosan: pumice (Ch–Pu), respectively. The experimental adsorption data fitted well a Langmuir isotherm (R2 > 0.99) and followed pseudo-second-order kinetics. The high stability of the materials and their high arsenic (V) removal efficiency (~93%) in a wide pH range (4 to 10) are useful for real field applications. Moreover, the blends could be regenerated using 0.05 M NaOH and used for several cycles without losing their original arsenic removal efficiency. The results of the study demonstrate that chitosan-volcanic rock blends should be further explored as a potential sustainable solution for removal of arsenic (V) from water.

Highlights

Arsenic (As) is released into the aquatic environment through a complex combination of natural biogeochemical reactions and human interactions
The net weight loss for chitosan-red scoria (Ch–Rs) was 13.02% and Ch–Pu was 13.26%. These weight losses should correspond to the amount of chitosan in the final blends. They are only about 3% lower than the initial amount of chitosan used to prepare the blends (~16%), which illustrates that the method used for coating the red scoria and pumice with chitosan is effective
The results demonstrate of immobilizing chitosan at initial pH 3.0–7.0 whereas pumice displayed

Summary

Introduction

Arsenic (As) is released into the aquatic environment through a complex combination of natural biogeochemical reactions and human interactions. Most arsenic related problems are due to mobilization and transport by natural processes such as weathering of rocks and minerals. Arsenic mobilization can be caused or aggravated by anthropogenic activities like mining, fossil-fuel combustion and smelting of Cu, Ni, Pb, and Zn ores [1,2,3,4]. Arsenic can occur in the environment in a number of oxidation states (−3, −1, 0, +3 and +5). In aqueous systems inorganic arsenic exists mainly in the oxidation states +3 as arsenite and +5 as arsenate, depending on the redox conditions [4]. As (III) is more mobile in natural water and is more toxic than As (V) [5,6]

Objectives

Methods

Results