Abstract

Forty recently extracted teeth with Class II amalgam restorations with overhangs were divided into four groups of 10 teeth each. The overhangs were removed using one of the following instruments in each group: trimmer, chisel, surgical blade and reciprocating motordriven diamond tip. Instrumentation was performed until no irregularity could be detected clinically with a No. 3 explorer. The tooth-amalgam interfaces were examined by combined use of a surface measuring instrument and a scanning electron microscope. Four tracings from each specimen were recorded and the discrepancy at the tooth-restoration interface was measured. The mean score for each tooth was determined, and the results were analyzed statistically. The tooth-restoration interfaces were photographed at 140 magnification with the SEM. The results indicated that all instruments tested were effective in removing overhangs, since none of the mean discrepancies registered after instrumentation exceed 4 micron. The surgical blade, and especially the reciprocating motor-driven diamond tip eliminated overhangs better than the chisel. Both SEM photographs and the profilometric tracings revealed gaps or voids at the toothamalgam interface, ranging from 10 to 50 micron.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.