Abstract
ABSTRACTOzone and ozone/peroxide processes were evaluated for the removal of 1,4-dioxane from laboratory water and site groundwater. The effect of process parameters such as solution pH and dosage of peroxide was studied. Ozone alone was not very effective in removing 1,4-dioxane from water (≤ 20% removal). Enhanced oxidation of 1,4-dioxane was achieved by increasing the solution pH or by adding peroxide at neutral pH. Pseudo–first-order rate constants were calculated for the removal of 1,4-dioxane using ozone. Correlations were developed for the consumption of ozone per 1,4-dioxane removed. Acidic and neutral pH conditions resulted in higher consumption of ozone per dioxane removed. Basic solution pH and presence of hydrogen peroxide enhanced the dioxane removal, which resulted in lower consumption of ozone per dioxane removed. Following the lab study, ozonation was used for the remediation of site groundwater contaminated with 1,4-dioxane and chlorinated volatile organics. Presence of 5 mg/L of hydrogen peroxide during ozonation resulted in simultaneous removal of 1,4-dioxane and volatile organics from groundwater to target levels. For the AOP process, removal kinetics was approximately 50% slower in groundwater compared to the lab DI water.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
