Abstract

P = 0.496 for LLS; P = 0.320 for AMS-C score) of AMS. RIPC also had no significant effect on SPAP [maximum after 10 h at high altitude; RIPC: 33 (SD 8) mmHg; controls: 37 (SD 7) mmHg; P = 0.19]. This study indicates that RIPC, performed immediately before passive ascent to 3,450 m, does not attenuate AMS and the magnitude of high-altitude pulmonary hypertension.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) has been reported to improve neurologic and pulmonary outcome following an acute ischemic or hypoxic insult, yet the effect of RIPC for protecting from high-altitude diseases remains to be determined. The present study shows that RIPC, performed immediately before passive ascent to 3,450 m, does not attenuate acute mountain sickness and the degree of high-altitude pulmonary hypertension. Therefore, RIPC cannot be recommended for prevention of high-altitude diseases.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call