Abstract

We propose a framework based on the 5W1H model-based metadata for remote diagnosis in virtual reality (VR). For this purpose, we suggest unique metadata composed of Point of Interest (POI)-extended anchor (xAnchor)-content for a context-aware service in virtual and augmented reality. We define the attributes of the metadata based on the 5W1H context for information retrieval according to the context in a remote diagnosis. Second, we propose the ontology-based linker metadata that express the relations between AR scenes and that retrieve external information. Moreover, we suggest heritage building information metadata for information retrieval according to context. For evaluation, we created a geo-tagged content tool and a remote diagnosis VR application. We conducted focus-group interviews and heuristic evaluations for remote diagnosis in VR to verify the methodology of this study. As a result, we found that experts were most satisfied with the functions that provide the contextualized information. This study contributes to the geospatial metadata for a context-aware service in VR/AR as well as the remote diagnosis framework to overcome the time-consuming problem of the existing remote diagnosis.

Highlights

  • We propose a remote diagnosis framework based on the 5W1H model-based metadata in virtual reality (VR)

  • For remote diagnosis in VR, we suggest Point of Interest (POI)- extended anchor-content metadata structure and metadata based on the 5W1H model-based metadata in VR

  • We conducted a focus-group interview and a heuristic evaluation with experts to explore the usefulness of remote diagnosis in VR

Read more

Summary

Introduction

We propose a remote diagnosis framework based on the 5W1H (what, when, where, who, why, and how) model-based metadata in virtual reality (VR). There have been numerous studies on metadata for heritage management [1,2] and standardization of virtual and augmented reality metadata [3]. These metadata are not suitable for a VR-based remote diagnosis which provides on-site and related information according to the context in VR. The model sorts complex contexts into six categories It has an advantage in generating various situations and in reflecting user context for the information retrieval system according to the context [4].

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call