Abstract

Abstract Recent increases in U.S. immigration enforcement at the local and state level may be impacting remittance flows to developing countries by curtailing undocumented immigration, restricting the cyclicality of migration flows and limiting employment opportunities for the undocumented. We examine how the remitting patterns of Mexican migrants in the United States are being impacted by two types of immigration enforcement policies: police-based initiatives, such as 287(g) agreements and Secure Communities, and employment-based programs, as is the case with employment verification mandates. We find that increased enforcement reduces the share of migrants sending money home. However, legal migrants remitting money home increase their money outflows enough to offset any reductions in remittance payments from their undocumented counterparts. As a result, the average dollar amount remitted per Mexican migrant rises in the midst of increased uncertainty, safeguarding remittances as one of the least volatile sources of income in the developing world.

Highlights

  • The Maricopa County Sheriff’s Office (MCSO) and Sheriff Joseph M.Arpaio (Arpaio) have engaged and continue to engage in a pattern or practice of unlawful discriminatory police conduct directed at Latinos in Maricopa County and jail practices that unlawfully discriminate against Latino prisoners with limitedEnglish language skills

  • Constitutional policing is an essential element of effective law enforcement

  • This Complaint sets out three categories of unlawful conduct: (1) a pattern or practice of discriminatory and otherwise unconstitutional law enforcement actions against Latinos in Maricopa County; (2) discriminatory jail practices against Latino prisoners with limited English language skills; and (3) a pattern or practice of retaliatory actions against perceived critics of MCSO activities

Read more

Summary

INTRODUCTION

The Maricopa County Sheriff’s Office (MCSO) and Sheriff Joseph M. Case 2:12-cv-00981-LOA Document 1 Filed 05/10/12 Page 3 of 32 disciplinary system, and dramatic departures from standard law enforcement practices This Complaint sets out three categories of unlawful conduct: (1) a pattern or practice of discriminatory and otherwise unconstitutional law enforcement actions against Latinos in Maricopa County; (2) discriminatory jail practices against Latino prisoners with limited English language skills; and (3) a pattern or practice of retaliatory actions against perceived critics of MCSO activities. This action is brought to enforce the First Amendment, Fourth Amendment, and Fourteenth Amendment of the United States Constitution; the Violent Crime. As a recipient of federal funds, the County is responsible for ensuring—and it has made contractual assurances that it will ensure—that the programs or activities to which it distributes those funds, including programs administered by MCSO, comply with federal law

BACKGROUND
The United States is authorized to initiate this action against Defendants
Otherwise Unconstitutional Manner
Unlawful Traffic Stops by the Human Smuggling Unit
Unconstitutional Manner
Practices that Protect against Discriminatory Policing
Latino Statements
Rights of Latino Limited English Proficient Prisoners
MCSO Has Retaliated against Perceived Critics of Its Practices in Violation
MCSO has received grants from the DOJ component Community Oriented
CLAIMS FOR RELIEF
VIOLATES TITLE VI
The Defendants signed contractual assurance agreements with the United
The Defendants therefore have violated their Title VI contractual
PRAYER FOR RELIEF
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.