Remineralization potential of apacider mangosteen adhesive pastes on artificial carious lesions

Abstract

Background/purposeAttention to caries administration has altered toward an early finding of lesions and targeted to noninvasive management with a remineralizing agent. This study compared the remineralization potential of apacider mangosteen adhesive pastes (AMAP), 500-ppm fluoride toothpaste (FT500), and 1000-ppm fluoride toothpaste (FT1000) on artificial caries. Materials and methodsArtificial caries were generated to enamel of eighty extracted human premolars. The specimens were allocated to four groups and subjected to pH-cycling with the application of testing agents (2 min each, for 10 days): (1) AMAP, dairy, (2) FT500, twice a day, (3) FT1000, twice a day, and (4) no treatment (NT). The surface microhardness was determined before demineralization, after demineralization, and after application of pH-cycling. The hardness, percent of hardness recovery (%HR), and percent of remineralization potential (%RP) were analyzed with ANOVA and Bonferroni's test (α = 0.05). Polarized light microscopy (PLM) was assessed for lesion depth. ResultsSignificant differences in remineralization were observed upon various agents compared to NT (P < 0.05). A significant difference in remineralization was found among AMAP, FT1000, and FT500 (P < 0.05). No significant difference in %HR and %RP was observed between AMAP and FT1000 (P > 0.05). PLM signified greater decrease in depth for AMAP, compared to FT1000 and FT500, but no depth reduction for NT. ConclusionAMAP possesses comparable remineralization ability to FT1000. However, decreasing in depth of carious lesions was evinced with using AMAP more than FT1000 and FT500. AMAP was recommended as a potential remineralization material for handling initial caries.