Abstract
IN RECENT YEARS SCHOLARS IN VARIOUS FIELDS have shown increasing interest in historical memory. Informed by anthropology, literary criticism, psychology, linguistics, and cultural studies, recent studies of historical memory have achieved considerable theoretical and analytical sophistication.1 At the same time, building on the work of theorists such as Henri Lefebvre and Pierre Nora, scholars in the humanities have also shown increasing interest in space and place as analytical concepts. Although scholarship on the American Southwest has always at some level been engaged with both history and place, Richard Flores's groundbreaking new study Remembering the Alamo: Memory, Modernity, and the Master Symbol is among the first in this field to incorporate recent theory from these two areas of research within a historical model.2 Yet to categorize Flores's wide-ranging interdisciplinary study of the Alamo myth as Mexican American, southwestern, or Marxist may be misleading. This book examines both the workings of Ameri-
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.