Abstract

Herding behavior was concluded to exist in some sectors and under some market conditions in the Jordanian stock market when measured using the cross-sectional absolute deviation. The purpose of this study was to retest the existence of the sectoral herding using the cross-sectional dispersion of betas and compare the results with those reached using the measure of the cross-sectional absolute deviation. Behavioral finance theory represents the main base on which this study was built. In this study, the researcher tried to answer questions related to whether herding behavior exists in the Jordanian market and its sectors if measured using cross-sectional dispersion of betas and whether results will be different from those reached using other measures. In this quantitative study, data from Amman stock exchange were used and the period covered was from 2000 to 2018. These data were used to calculate the cross-sectional dispersion of betas which was tested using t-test, Kruskal–Wallis test, Mann-Whitney U test, and Wilcoxon Signed-Rank test. Results indicated that herding behavior existed in market and in each sector at the same level which was not affected by the financial crisis. Furthermore, the study revealed that herding level was the same when the market (sector) was rising and when it was falling and this similarity has not been changed by the occurrence of the global financial crisis. Finally, results indicated that herding was at its lowest level in the entire market and in the industrial sector during the time of financial crisis. These results are different from those of the study conducted in Jordan using cross-sectional absolute deviation which implies that using different herding measures yields different results.

Highlights

  • Herding behavior in the financial markets can increase the gap between the actual and the expected prices of stocks (Cakan, & Balagyozyan, 2016)

  • Study results revealed that investors in the stock market of Jordan practiced herding at the level of the entire market which is the same conclusion reached by Obaidat (2016), Ramadan (2015), Nasarudin et al (2017), and Chen (2013) and opposite to the results of Al-Shboul (2012)

  • Results indicated that herding existed in each sector of the market which supports the conclusions of Cakan, and Balagyozyan (2016) who detected herding in all industries of the stock market in Turkey

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Herding behavior in the financial markets can increase the gap between the actual and the expected prices of stocks (Cakan, & Balagyozyan, 2016). Many studies were conducted in many countries to test the existence of herding using only one measure (Akinsomi, Coskun, & Gupta, 2018; ; Dutta, Gahan, & Panda, 2016; Nasarudin, Noordin, Law, & Yahya, 2017; Sharma, Narayan, & Thuraisamy, 2015; Trenca, Pece, & Mihut, 2015). The conclusions of these studies may have provided misleading indicators about the existence of herding in their markets if the conclusions of other measures are different. Conclusion about herding existence may differ based on the measure used to detect the behavior (Vieira & Pereira, 2015)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call