Abstract

Clinical trials produced conflicting results on the benefits of remdesivir in SARS-CoV-2 infection. While short-term treatment is beneficial, long-term treatment shows no improvement in mortality rate and outcomes, and exhibited worsened clinical status than short-term remdesivir treatment for immunocompetent individuals. On other hand immunocompromised patients were benefitted in long-term remdesivir treatment. Remdesivir exhibited both suppressive and curative effects against covid infection in these individuals. We propose that remdesivir may not be suitable for long-term treatment of immunocompetent patients, as it lowers the immunity through interfering with the endonuclease activity of RAG1, which is a critical enzyme responsible for V(D)J-recombination. In silico study shows, remdesivir, interfere with the DNA cleavage activity of RAG-1, thus lowering immunity. Remdesivir exhibits a higher binding affinity towards the heptamer-binding domain (HBD) of RAG1 than the nonamer-binding domain and exhibited affinity similar to elvitegravir, a RAG1 inhibitor. Interestingly, remdesivir active metabolite GS-443902 has shown stronger binding affinity towards RAG1 HBD, than their intended target viral RdRP. Thus, remdesivir, may be undesirable for long-term treatment in immunocompetent individuals, but may be beneficial for immunocompromised RAG-deficient/ downregulated patients as chances of remdesivir-RAG binding is minimum in those patients. To prove our hypothesis, lymphoid development and V(D)J recombination need to be documented in immunocompetent patients receiving long-term remdesivir. Real-world data in larger trials are necessary to evaluate remdesivir’s effect in B/Tcell depleted/compromised population challenged with covid 19. Studies need to be conducted to show Remdesivir inhibit RAG activity in vitro and V(D)J recombination in vivo.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call