Abstract
This Letter aims to make clear about the information reported in the paper "Complications from laser Endolift use: Case series and literature review," published in this journal (2023, 16(03), 023–041, DOI:https://doi.org/10.30574/wjbphs.2023.16.3.0496), where authors present a series of complications concerning the use of very different laser devices with different wavelengths, beam profiles, and laser optical fibers without detailing these characteristics or attributing them to a specific manufacturer. The Tables inserted in the Letter demonstrate the fake relationship between complications and “EndoliftÒ” by Lasermar 1500tm, as asserted by Fabio dos Santos Borges et al. The paper considering "EndoliftÒ" complications as relative to a multitude of techniques made with "different laser" is misleading; quite the opposite it should distinguish between the outcomes of the official “EndoliftÒ” by Lasemar 1500tm laser protocols, and other systems, very different by technical and methodological points of view.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: World Journal of Biology Pharmacy and Health Sciences
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
