Abstract
The article is devoted to the analysis of the role of the religious factor in the development of the sub-ethnic national movement studying the case of the Kryashens. The study is based on Jose Casanova’s concept of the religious revival. Following Casanova, the author assumes that religious identity can become the basis of an ethnic identity only if religion transforms from a state-oriented institution into an institution oriented towards the society and actively participating in its improvement. At the same time, revealing the dynamic nature of the formation of the (sub)ethnic groups, the author relies on the ethnosymbolic concept of John Hutchinson, which focuses on the importance of the ethnically significant symbols. In the case of the Kryashens a religious marker represents such a symbol. The article examines in detail two stages of the Kryashens’ religious revival. The first stage occurred in the second half of the 19th century and was associated primarily with the missionary activity of Nikolay Ilminsky. The second stage started in 1989 and continues today. The research carried out by the author lends unequivocal support to the idea that religion played a key role in the formation of an original Kryashen ethno-cultural identity. At the same time, it shows that within Kryashens’ religiosity the vector is directed from society to religion rather than from religion to society. Their religious identity is instrumental. However, although there are very few ultra-religious people in the Kryashen community and most of the Kryashens are secularized, religion remains one of the most important markers of their ethnic identity.
Highlights
The article is devoted to the analysis of the role
of the religious factor in the development of the sub-ethnic national movement studying the case of the Kryashens
The study is based on Jose Casanova's concept of the religious revival
Summary
Возникновение субэтнических групп — длительный процесс, который вначале происходит внутри единой нации, но затем приобретает внешнее измерение. Это сопряжено с нарастанием противоречий с «ядром» нации, обусловленным постепенным расхождением в представлениях о путях развития народа. Согласно этносимволической концепции национализма Джона Хатчинсона, субэтническое движение берет курс на отделение от «ядра» нации в том случае, когда видит альтернативные варианты своего развития. Триггером создания субэтносом альтернативного нарратива развития нередко становится иное, нежели у доминирующей части нации, вероисповедование. В подобных ситуациях именно религия, как правило, образует фундамент формирующейся субэтнической идентичности. Однако в случае с субэтническими группами, где маркером идентичности выступает религия, не годится ни один, ни другой вариант. Несмотря на то что внутри такого субэтноса могут быть атеисты или даже приверженцы других религий, в их этнической идентичности содержатся религиозные элементы, которые формируют и легитимируют ее. В основу исследования легла концепция религиозного возрождения известного американского социолога религии Хосе Казановы
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: The Journal of Political Theory, Political Philosophy and Sociology of Politics Politeia
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.