Abstract
Lenn Goodman's defense of a vital role for religiously grounded considerations in the political culture of a pluralistic liberal polity is supported in important respects though aspects of his critique of secular pluralism are challenged. It is true that secular liberalism sometimes fails to acknowledge constructive ways religion can figure in pluralistic liberal political culture. Additionally, it sometimes excludes valuative considerations crucial to many persons’ deepest commitments and convictions. Also, there is merit in Goodman's critique of public reason. However, liberal theory contains resources enabling it to respond to some of the objections he elaborates. Moreover, claiming that pluralism will be stunted and inadequate to human needs and concerns without values and reasons that transcend politics is more problematic than Goodman suggests. The intelligibility of the valuative considerations figuring in politics remains challenging. Without a standard of public reason what can be an effective basis for socio-political—if pluralistic—cohesion?
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.