Abstract
Abstract After reconstructing Niklas Luhmann's theory of religion in focusing on the idea that religious faith is communicative and not psychological, I attempt to demonstrate how the indeterminability, or inconceivability, of religious figures (e. g., Cod) is accomplished as a discursive practice. For this purpose, an old Japanese Buddhist text is discussed. Because of its functionalism, Luhmann's argument seems to be inseparable from the religious discourse which is the very phenomenon to be investigated. The aim of this paper is to propose a possibility of treating religion as a social phenomenon without staying on too intimate terms with religious discourse.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
