Abstract

This article addresses the search for religion’s “suitable place” within International Relations (IR), taking as a starting point the social changes in the world (“reflexive modernity”) and the postulated “Mesopotamian turn” in IR. The assumption is that religion is present at each level of IR analysis in the Middle East and, thanks to that, more and more at the international system level. This presence of religion serves to undermine one of the basic assumptions lying at the heart of the modern international order (and therefore also IR), i.e., the so-called “Westphalian presumption”. The author, inter alia, emphasizes how more attention needs to be paid to the “transnational region” constituted by the Middle East—in association with the whole Islamic World. A second postulate entails the need for a restoration of the lost level of analysis in IR, i.e., the level of the human being, for whom religion is—and in the nearest future, will remain—an important dimension of life, in the Middle East in particular. It can also be noted how, within analysis of IR, what corresponds closely to the level referred to is the concept of human security developed via the UN system. The Middle East obliges the researcher to extend considerations to the spiritual dimension of security, as is starting to be realized (inter alia, in the Arab Human Development Reports). It can thus be suggested that, through comparison and contrast with life in societies of the Middle East as it is in practice, religion has been incorporated quite naturally into IR, with this leaving the “Westphalian presumption” undermined at the same time. The consequences of that for the whole discipline may be considerable, but much will depend on researchers themselves, who may or may not take up the challenge posed.

Highlights

  • One of the greatest problems that social-science researchers face is the gap between theoretical considerations and the social reality they observe

  • A second postulate entails the need for a restoration of the lost level of analysis in International Relations (IR), i.e., the level of the human being, for whom religion is—and in the nearest future, will remain—an important dimension of life, in the Middle East in particular

  • It can be suggested that, through comparison and contrast with life in societies of the Middle East as it is in practice, religion has been incorporated quite naturally into IR, with this leaving the “Westphalian presumption”

Read more

Summary

Introduction

One of the greatest problems that social-science researchers face is the gap between theoretical considerations and the social reality they observe. Under the influence of IR’s incorporation of both constructivism and alternative theories (alongside the classical approach), leaving the state and material factors as the centers of attention, there appeared analysis of the influence of other entities, as well as factors underpinning identity, including ideas, norms, and values impacting international relations These changes were favorable from the point of view of research into religion in IR, as they prepared the ground for a re-evaluation of the Westphalian synthesis and a weakening of the “power of secularism”. Thanks to the “Mesopotamian turn”, religious consideration could impact upon IR’s further evolution, with a way of achieving this being the reanalysis of the religion’s presence from the point of view of different levels of analysis

The International System Level and Religion in the Middle East
Findings
The Level of the Nation-State and Religion in the Middle East
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call