Abstract

Different discussions about separation of religion and politics and secularism motivated this thought that is there any consistency between religious society and democracy or not. The starting point in the discussions is the lack of democracy in religious community and totalitarian nature of society from scientific and technological aspects. The belief that the religious community cannot tolerate various views motivated me to think more in this regard and the result is the present study to use inductive method and evaluate the details and reach generalities that religion cannot negate democracy. The main question of study is whether religion and democracy are combined? The exiting hypotheses show that individualistic approaches in human communities are better than religious approach. Individualistic approaches are mostly based on democracy basics. Religion is the origin of real democracy in human communities. The important hypothesis in this study is accepting the main position of human being and his real origin is its consistency on Sharia. The variables of study are different human communities, the thought origin of communities, awareness of society to religious orders, the relationship of society with the God speech soul via perceiving Quran, historical and political history of society, thought evolution in joining process to global village and other variables as they can change the inference of human aspects and God speech.

Highlights

  • Different discussions about separation of religion and politics and secularism motivated this thought that is there any consistency between religious society and democracy or not

  • Giarmi believes that democracy is the structure of institutions but real power is dedicated to the rulers as selected.[2]

  • According to Webster new collegiate dictionary, there is such meaning for democracy: Democracy is the control of power not in an individual and not special group and it is on the hand of public as applied via selected agents via parties channel [1-5]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Different discussions about separation of religion and politics and secularism motivated this thought that is there any consistency between religious society and democracy or not. He was the first one who found about majority despotism and in social contract book attempted to solve it and he had concept of legal government and political thought was considered.

Results
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.