Abstract
This study attempts to provide one of the first comprehensive analyses on the relationship between sovereign credit ratings and governance indicators. The analyses are performed using ordered response models and panel regression techniques. The findings indicate that better governance, measured by six different Worldwide Governance Indicators, is positively associated with higher credit ratings. I also find that sovereign credit ratings significantly respond to the developments in these indicators. These results imply that credit rating agencies remain alert on the quality of governance. This caution sheds doubt on the accuracy of sovereign credit ratings since several measures of governance, and Worldwide Governance Indicators in particular, have several weaknesses. This article proposes that credit rating agencies consider employing their internal sources to measure the quality of governance to eliminate reliance on governance indicators.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
