Reliable measurement methods for the isovolumic relaxation time: comparisons of dual gate Doppler and seven other methods

Abstract

PurposeIsovolumic relaxation time (IVRT) is a useful indicator of diastolic dysfunction. However, a measurement method for IVRT has not been established. The Dual Gate Doppler method, which can record two separate pulse-wave Doppler signals simultaneously using two sample gates, may be ideal for measuring IVRT. This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of IVRT measured using conventional methods versus that measured using the Dual Gate Doppler method.MethodsA total of 104 patients (mean age 58 ± 21 years, 48 women) were examined using ultrasound equipment with Dual Gate Doppler at our hospital. In addition to Dual Gate Doppler method, IVRTs were measured using seven different methods: pulsed Doppler (PW method), continuous wave Doppler (CW method), and other methods. The IVRT values obtained using the Dual Gate Doppler method were compared with those measured using other methods.ResultsAll IVRTs measured using conventional methods showed a strong correlation with the that measured using the Dual Gate Doppler method. However, there were slight deifferences among the IVRTs depending on the method. The PW method and the PW time difference method using only the PW showed small statistical bias and were not complicated. The IVRT measured using the CW method was significantly longer than that measured using the Dual Gate Doppler method.ConclusionsAmong the conventional methods, the PW method was the simplest and most practical method for measuring the IVRT in any conditions as arrhythmias. It is important to recognize the characteristics of IVRTs based on the measurement method.