Abstract

The pnicogen, chalcogen, and halogen bonds between 6-OXF2-fulvene (X = As, Sb, Se, Te, Br, and I) and three nitrogen-containing bases (FCN, HCN, and NH3) are compared. For each nitrogen base, the halogen bond is strongest, followed by the pnicogen bond, and the chalcogen bond is weakest. For each type of bond, the binding increases in the FCN < HCN < NH3 pattern. Both FCN and HCN engage in a bond with comparable strengths and the interaction energies of most bonds are < −6 kcal/mol. However, the strongest base NH3 forms a much more stable complex, particularly for the halogen bond with the interaction energy going up to −18 kcal/mol. For the same type of interaction, its strength increases as the mass of the central X atom increases. These bonds are different in strength, but all of them are dominated by the electrostatic interaction, with the polarization contribution important for the stronger interaction. The presence of these bonds changes the geometries of 6-OXF2-fulvene, particularly for the halogen bond formed by NH3, where the F-X-F arrangement is almost vertical to the fulvene ring.

Highlights

  • Intermolecular interactions can regulate many chemical and biological processes (Oshovsky et al, 2007; Schneider, 2009; Zayed et al, 2010)

  • The electron donors PH3 and AsH3 are compared with NH3. These complexes are compared with the ZB, chalcogen bond (ChB), and XB of more conventional molecules found in the literature. We explore their similarities and differences in the present study by means of natural bond orbital (NBO), atoms in molecules (AIM), molecular electrostatic potential (MEP), and energy decomposition (ED) analyses

  • Three different types of complexes formed between 6-OXF2fulvene (X = As, Sb, Se, Te, Br, and I) and the three N bases FCN, HCN and NH3 were studied

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Intermolecular interactions can regulate many chemical and biological processes (Oshovsky et al, 2007; Schneider, 2009; Zayed et al, 2010). Insight into these interactions is helpful in promoting development of supramolecular chemistry (Smith, 2005; Uhlenheuer et al, 2010; Bauzá et al, 2014), materials science (Müller-Dethlefs and Hobza, 2000; Vickaryous et al, 2004), and the rational design of new drugs and biochemistry (Xu et al, 2011; Lu et al, 2012). Interest in other intermolecular interactions has been growing rapidly. Scientists have tried to provide a consistent explanation for the origin

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call