Reliability of unconventional centre of pressure measures of quiet standing balance in people with chronic stroke

Abstract

BackgroundPeople with stroke often have asymmetric motor impairment. Investigating asymmetries in, and dynamic properties of, centre of pressure movement during quiet standing can inform how balance is controlled. Research questionWhat are the test-retest reliabilities of unconventional measures of quiet standing balance control in people with chronic stroke? MethodsTwenty people with chronic stroke (>6 months post-stroke), who were able to stand for at least 30 s without support, were recruited. Participants completed two 30-second quiet standing trials in a standardized position. Unconventional measures of quiet standing balance control included: symmetry of variability in centre of pressure displacement and velocity, between-limb synchronization, and sample entropy. Root mean square of centre of pressure displacement and velocity in the antero-posterior and medio-lateral directions were also calculated. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were used to determine test-retest reliability, and Bland-Altman plots were created to examine proportional biases. ResultsICC3,2 were between 0.79 and 0.95 for all variables, indicating ‘good’ to ‘excellent’ reliability (>0.75). However, ICC3,1 for symmetry indices and between-limb synchronization were < 0.75. Bland-Altman plots revealed possible proportional biases for root mean square of medio-lateral centre of pressure displacement and velocity and between-limb synchronization, with larger between-trial differences for participants with worse values. SignificanceThese findings suggest that centre of pressure measures extracted from a single 30-second quiet standing trial may have sufficient reliability for some research studies in chronic stroke. However, for clinical applications, the average of at least two trials may be required.