Abstract
Numerical models play a vital role in the SOFC (solid oxide fuel cell) research field; nonetheless, one can never rely on a non-validated model. Numerous models exist in the literature; however, they are utmost validated with the conventional IV (current-voltage) curves, whereas the temperature variations are almost never validated. In this study, we present spatial currents and temperatures computed by a numerical model and measured in-situ by the electrode-segmentation method in microtubular-SOFCs. By exploiting these numerical and experimental data, we evaluate the accuracy of the current distribution predicted by a numerical model validated with the conventional IV curve. This evaluation shows that the numerical model underestimates the current variations. Secondly, we assess the reliability of the temperature distribution predicted by the model verified with the conventional IV curve. This assessment reveals that the numerically computed temperatures substantially differ from the experimental results with the rising current density. Thirdly, we analyze the accuracy of the model-validation based on the IV curves and the temperature variations. This double validation approach improves the accuracy of the model.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
