Reliability of Spinopelvic Measurements That May Influence the Cup Position in Total Hip Arthroplasty

Abstract

BackgroundSpinopelvic pathology has been identified as a potential risk factor for instability after total hip arthroplasty. Spinopelvic radiographic parameters used to diagnose spinopelvic disease may also impact optimal cup placement. The purpose of this study was to assess the arthroplasty surgeon accuracy in making spinopelvic measurements. MethodsFive fellowship-trained or in-training arthroplasty surgeons reviewed 44 lateral lumbar radiographs in two sessions. All evaluators were instructed how to perform measurements but had little experience in doing so. Traditional measurements included the pelvic tilt (PT), pelvic incidence (PI), and sacral slope (SS), and novel measurements included the acetabular ante-inclination (AI) and pelvic femoral angle. Surgeon measurements were compared with those made by experienced engineers. intraclass coefficients (ICCs) were calculated and interpreted. ResultsThe interobserver reliability for 4 of 5 of the spinopelvic parameters was good to excellent (ICC >0.75) with the highest reliability seen for PI measurement (ICC = 0.939). Only moderate interobserver reliability was observed for AI measurement (ICC = 0.559). Intraobserver reliability was the highest for the PI and SS, ranging from moderate to good (ICC, 0.718 to 0.896). The lowest intraobserver reliability was seen for the AI (ICC range, 0.026 to 0.545) and pelvic femoral angle (ICC range, 0.035 to 0.828). Surgeon measurements of PT and SS were compared with engineer measurements with extremely poor correlation observed (ICC <0 for all). ConclusionSurgeon intraobserver and interobserver reliability in making novel radiographic measurements was low compared with traditional radiographic measurements. Surgeon reliability in making traditional measurements of the PT and SS was very poor compared with experienced assessors using software-based measurements.