Abstract
Abstract: evidence has no predetermined strength. However, in practice, among the equal strength of evidence, the forensic examination was and remains in the civil process the “queen of evidence”. The current approach is not fair and correct, especially in the context of the actual “irresponsibility” of the expert and the often-poor quality of expert research. The article attempts to give an overall assessment of the reliability of the results of the forensic construction examination in order to determine the volume of work performed only from the executive and design documentation available in the case file.
Full Text 
Sign-in/Register to access full text options
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Paper version not known
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
