Abstract

The aim of this study was to assess the reliability of pelvic floor muscles evaluation via transabdominal ultrasonography in young nulliparous women and to present the methodology for quantitative assessment of the ultrasound image of the pelvic floor muscles visible as displacement of the posterior wall of the bladder, caused by action of the pelvic floor muscles. The study comprised 30 young, Caucasian, nulliparous women (age 22–27; 168.6 ± 5.1 cm; 57.1 ± 11.8 kg) without pelvic floor muscle dysfunctions. The intra-rater, test-retest and inter-rater reliability of pelvic floor muscles evaluation was performed using transabdominal ultrasound at rest and during voluntary contraction. The reliability was assessed at three points of the image (at the middle, on the right and left side). The reliability of the three-point measurement of the pelvic floor muscles transabdominal ultrasound is excellent in the case of intra-rater assessments, both at rest (ICC = 0.98–0.99) and during contraction (ICC = 0.97–0.98); moderate at rest (ICC = 0.54–0.62) and poor during contraction (ICC = 0.22–0.50) in the case of test–retest assessment; excellent at rest (ICC = 0.95–0.96), and good during contraction (ICC = 0.81–0.87) in the case of inter-rater assessment. Transabdominal ultrasound is a reliable method of pelvic floor muscle evaluation. The three-points of assessment used in our study allowed for broader and more comprehensive imaging of the pelvic floor muscle, e.g., for quantitative detection contractility imbalances between the left and right side Due to the fact that understanding mechanisms of pelvic floor muscle functioning is crucial in the therapy of pelvic floor dysfunctions, therefore, reliable, valid tests and instruments are important.

Highlights

  • The results of our research showed that the reliability of the 3-point measurement of pelvic floor muscles (PFM) transabdominal ultrasound is: excellent in the case of intra-rater assessments, both at rest (ICC = 0.98–0.99) and during contraction (ICC = 0.97–0.98); moderate at rest (ICC = 0.54–0.62) and poor during contraction (ICC = 0.22–0.50) in the case of test–retest assessment; excellent at rest (ICC = 0.95–0.96) and good during contraction (ICC = 0.81–0.87)

  • It has been previously reported that intra-rater reliability of bladder base displacement during maximal voluntary contraction of PFM, measured by transabdominal ultrasound, and assessed on the image at one point, only ranged between ICC = 0.63–0.94 [15,18,19,20,21]

  • The results of our research have allowed us to indicate that transabdominal ultrasound is a reliable method of PFM evaluation

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The pelvic floor muscles (PFM) form a deep pelvic diaphragm The PFMs support the abdomino-pelvic organs, are responsible for bladder continence, trunk stabilization and respiration. They play an important role in generating, maintaining and increasing intra-abdominal pressure for functional tasks [3,4,5,6,7]. Because the bladder is supported by PFM and their fascia, the contraction of the PFMs results in displacement of the bladder base. Chehrehrazi et al [8] reported transabdominal ultrasound to be a reliable tool for quantifying PFM displacement by means of bladder base movement

Objectives
Methods
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call