Abstract
The reliability of furrow‐infiltration parameters computed from advance measurements was analyzed. Lumped parameters were obtained using the least‐squares approach. The objective function was formulated using advance time and velocity observations as a function of distance. Predicted values were calculated with a finite difference hydrodynamic model with wetted perimeter‐dependent infiltration. The Extended Kostiakov equation was used to describe infiltration‐rate variation with time. Reliability was examined by comparing recorded total intake and runoff with values predicted with the single average parameters. Results showed that reliability of coefficients depends on the relationship between infiltration variability, furrow length, and inflow rate. In particular, relatively short irrigation times hampered the identification of the steady infiltration rate. Spatial trends in infiltration rates affected the reliability of parameters as well. The magnitude and nature of the resulting prediction errors was ...
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
