Abstract

Introduction:The aim of this study was to evaluate the reliability of the femoral component rotation on intra-operative data recorded in a computer-assisted navigation system (CAN-FRA) compared with the post-operative femoral component rotation observed on computed tomography (CT-FRA).Material and method:Computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty (TKA) or primary osteoarthritis of the knee was performed in 51 knees in 36 patients with a mean age of 69.51 years. All procedures were performed by a single surgeon using the same implant design. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to compare the intra-operative CAN-FRA with the post-operative CT-FRA. The angle between the anatomical epicondylar axis and the posterior condylar axis of the implant (CT-FRA) was measured at two separate timepoints by three observers who were blinded to the intra-operative CAN-FRA. Internal rotation was defined as rotation in the negative direction, while external rotation was defined as positive.Results:The mean intra-operative CAN-FRA was 0.1° ± 2.8° (range -5.0° to 5.5°). The mean post-operative CT-FRA was -1.3° ± 2.1° (range -4.6° to 4.4°). The mean difference between the CAN-FRA and the CT-FRA was -1.3° ± 2.2° (range -7.9° to 2.4°). The respective ICC values for the three observers were 0.92, 0.94, and 0.93, while the respective intra-observer coefficients were 0.91, 0.85, and 0.90. The ICC for the intra-operative CAN-FRA versus the post-operative CT-FRA was 0.71.Conclusion:This study shows that using a computer-assisted navigation system in TKA achieves reliable results and helps to achieve optimal positioning of the femoral component and rotation alignment correction.

Highlights

  • The aim of this study was to evaluate the reliability of the femoral component rotation on intraoperative data recorded in a computer-assisted navigation system (CAN-FRA) compared with the post-operative femoral component rotation observed on computed tomography (CT-FRA)

  • It has not been shown that femoral rotational alignment achieved via total knee arthroplasty (TKA) performed with CAN is more accurate than that achieved in conventional TKA . 11,15,17,27-29 The aim of the present study was to evaluate the reliability of the femoral component rotation on intra-operative data recorded in a CAN system (CAN-FRA) compared with the postoperative femoral component rotation observed on computed tomography (CT-FRA)

  • 36 consecutive patients (51 knees; 29 left and 22 right) with tricompartment osteoarthritis of the knee who underwent TKA performed with an imageless CAN system (CAN TKA) in our hospital from 1st January 2014 to 31st December 2015 were enrolled in this study

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The aim of this study was to evaluate the reliability of the femoral component rotation on intraoperative data recorded in a computer-assisted navigation system (CAN-FRA) compared with the post-operative femoral component rotation observed on computed tomography (CT-FRA). Studies comparing the component alignment attained using computer-assisted navigation (CAN) versus the conventional technique have found that CAN increases the accuracy of prosthesis alignment in TKA4,13-24, especially in patients with extraarticular deformity and tibial or femoral bowing[25,26], and increases the accuracy of coronal alignment[20,21,22,23,24]. 11,15,17,27-29 The aim of the present study was to evaluate the reliability of the femoral component rotation on intra-operative data recorded in a CAN system (CAN-FRA) compared with the postoperative femoral component rotation observed on computed tomography (CT-FRA) It has not been shown that femoral rotational alignment achieved via TKA performed with CAN is more accurate than that achieved in conventional TKA . 11,15,17,27-29 The aim of the present study was to evaluate the reliability of the femoral component rotation on intra-operative data recorded in a CAN system (CAN-FRA) compared with the postoperative femoral component rotation observed on computed tomography (CT-FRA)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call