Reliability of cervical muscle volume quantification using magnetic resonance imaging

Abstract

BackgroundMagnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is used to quantify the size and structure of the architecturally complex cervical spine musculature of individuals with traumatic and idiopathic neck pain. However, to our knowledge, no scan-rescan reliability data is available on neck muscle volumes. ObjectivesThis study investigates the intra- and inter-rater reliability and scan-rescan reliability in cervical muscle volume investigations. DesignClinical Measurement, Reliability study. MethodsMRI scans were performed and repeated (within 1 h) for five asymptomatic individuals. Two raters manually traced levator scapulae, multifidus including semispinalis cervicis, semispinalis capitis, splenius capitis including splenius cervicis, and sternocleidomastoid using Analyze software (v12.0). Reliability was determined using intra-class correlation coefficients, Lin's concordance coefficient and Bland-Altman plots, with interpretation of reliability coefficients using the criteria from Fleiss. ResultsIntra-rater reliability of muscle quantification was excellent (ICCs ranging from 0.78 to 0.96). Inter-rater reliability was excellent for sternocleidomastoid(ICC 0.92, 95% CI 0.80, 0.97) and splenius capitis (ICC 0.77, 0.51, 0.90), and ranged from fair to good for levator scapulae (0.63, 0.18, 0.85), multifidus (0.73, 0.44, 0.88), and semispinalis capitis (0.50, 0.08, 0.77). The scan-rescan reliability was excellent for all muscles (ICCs ranging from 0.94 to 0.98). ConclusionThreats to reliability appear to be more related to manual quantification of muscles on images rather than protocols related to re-positioning a participant in the scanner and repeating the same protocol.The current findings suggest that the proposed methods can be used in establishing normative data for cervical muscle volume and comparing individuals with and without neck pain.