Abstract

Countermovement jump (CMJ) force-time testing is commonly used to monitor seasonal alterations in athletes’ CMJ strategy (to infer alterations in neuromuscular function). The flight time to contraction time (FT:CT) ratio and reactive strength index modified (RSImod) are considered to be two primary CMJ variables of interest. Due to similar calculations, it is likely that the FT:CT ratio and RSImod share similar reliability and an almost perfect relationship. Consequently, there may be no requirement to include both variables in CMJ monitoring reports. This study aimed to investigate this by recruiting twenty-five males to perform three CMJs on a force platform across two sessions that were separated by one week. The FT:CT ratio and two calculations of RSImod (based on the jump height from either flight time or take-off velocity) were then calculated using robust methods. The between-day reliability was good-excellent for all of the variables (95% confidence interval range of the coefficient of variation = 2.02–9.22%) with no significant between-day differences noted (p ≥ 0.231). There was an almost perfect positive relationship between the FT:CT ratio and RSImod regardless of the calculation method (r = 0.944–0.947, p < 0.001). As the FT:CT ratio and RSImod yield similar absolute reliability and share 90% of common variance, there is little reason to include both variables in CMJ monitoring reports.

Highlights

  • Countermovement jump (CMJ) testing via force platform analysis is commonplace across a variety of sports settings in addition to many sports science research studies [1]

  • The rationale for this type of assessment is that changes in jump strategy that lead to either changes in or maintenance of jump height (JH) are thought to provide insight into alterations in neuromuscular function, namely due to supercompensation or fatigue [2,3]

  • All of the subjects competed in team sports at an amateur level, performed unsupervised resistance training at least twice weekly, and had previous experience of performing CMJs in line with the protocols that were discussed in the procedures section

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Countermovement jump (CMJ) testing via force platform analysis is commonplace across a variety of sports settings in addition to many sports science research studies [1]. The rationale for this type of assessment is that changes in jump strategy (i.e., the underpinning force and time characteristics) that lead to either changes in or maintenance of jump height (JH) are thought to provide insight into alterations in neuromuscular function, namely due to supercompensation or fatigue [2,3]. The FT:CT ratio has mainly been utilized as an indirect measure of monitoring neuromuscular fatigue in team sport athletes [6,7,8]. The RSImod has mainly been used to compare neuromuscular function between different athletic groups [9,10,11,12], it has recently been suggested that it might be a useful method of indirectly monitoring neuromuscular fatigue

Objectives
Methods
Findings
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call