Abstract

A notable reliability model is the binary threshold system (also called the weighted-k-out-of-n system), which is a dichotomous system that is successful if and only if the weighted sum of its component successes exceeds or equals a particular threshold. The aim of this paper is to extend the utility of this model to the reliability analysis of a homogeneous binary-imaged multi-state coherent threshold system of (m+1) states, which is a non-repairable system with independent non-identical components. The paper characterizes such a system via switching-algebraic expressions of either system success or system failure at each non-zero level. These expressions are given either (a) as minimal sum-of-products formulas, or (b) as probability–ready expressions, which can be immediately converted, on a one-to-one basis, into probabilities or expected values. The various algebraic characterizations can be supplemented by a multitude of map representations, including a single multi-value Karnaugh map (MVKM) (giving a superfluous representation of the system structure function S), (m+1) maps of binary entries and multi-valued inputs representing the binary instances of S, or m maps, again of binary entries and multi-valued inputs, but now representing the success/failure at every non-zero level of the system. We demonstrate how to reduce these latter maps to conventional Karnaugh maps (CKMs) of much smaller sizes. Various characterizations are inter-related, and also related to pertinent concepts such as shellability of threshold systems, and also to characterizations via minimal upper vectors or via maximal lower vectors.

Highlights

  • Two of the most fruitful and successful paradigms of system reliability modeling are those of the multi-state model (Barlow and Wu, 1978; Boedigheimer and Kapur, 1994; El-Neweihi et al, 1978; Griffith, 1980; Hudson and Kapur, 1983; Janan, 1985; Kumar and Singh, 2018; Lisnianski and Levitin, 2003; Mo et al, 2015; Ram, 2013; Tian et al, 2008; Wood, 1985), and the threshold model (Rushdi, 1990; Rushdi and Alturki, 2015, 2018; Rushdi and Bjaili, 2016), known as the weighted k-out-of-n model (Eryilmaz, 2015; Li et al, 2016; Eryilmaz and Bozbulut, 2019; Salehi et al, 2019)

  • This paper dealt with the reliability characterization and analysis of a homogeneous multi-state coherent threshold system of (m + 1) states, which is a non-repairable system with independent non-identical components

  • The paper presents switching-algebraic expressions of both system success and system failure at each non-zero level. These expressions are given as minimal sumof-products formulas or as probability–ready expressions

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Two of the most fruitful and successful paradigms of system reliability modeling are those of the multi-state model (Barlow and Wu, 1978; Boedigheimer and Kapur, 1994; El-Neweihi et al, 1978; Griffith, 1980; Hudson and Kapur, 1983; Janan, 1985; Kumar and Singh, 2018; Lisnianski and Levitin, 2003; Mo et al, 2015; Ram, 2013; Tian et al, 2008; Wood, 1985), and the threshold model (Rushdi, 1990; Rushdi and Alturki, 2015, 2018; Rushdi and Bjaili, 2016), known as the weighted k-out-of-n model (Eryilmaz, 2015; Li et al, 2016; Eryilmaz and Bozbulut, 2019; Salehi et al, 2019). This paper is a serious attempt to unify the two models for the case of a coherent system with a well-defined binary image (Ansell and Bendell, 1987). This model of a multi-state coherent threshold system is very versatile, . This paper explores and inter-relates a variety of algebraic, map, and vector characterizations of this model, and explains how to evaluate its reliability via switching-algebraic techniques and tools used in the binary case (Rushdi and Goda, 1985; Rushdi and Abdulghani, 1993; Rushdi and Hassan, 2015, 2016)

Objectives
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.