Abstract
A notable reliability model is the binary threshold system (also called the weighted-k-out-of-n system), which is a dichotomous system that is successful if and only if the weighted sum of its component successes exceeds or equals a particular threshold. The aim of this paper is to extend the utility of this model to the reliability analysis of a homogeneous binary-imaged multi-state coherent threshold system of (m+1) states, which is a non-repairable system with independent non-identical components. The paper characterizes such a system via switching-algebraic expressions of either system success or system failure at each non-zero level. These expressions are given either (a) as minimal sum-of-products formulas, or (b) as probability–ready expressions, which can be immediately converted, on a one-to-one basis, into probabilities or expected values. The various algebraic characterizations can be supplemented by a multitude of map representations, including a single multi-value Karnaugh map (MVKM) (giving a superfluous representation of the system structure function S), (m+1) maps of binary entries and multi-valued inputs representing the binary instances of S, or m maps, again of binary entries and multi-valued inputs, but now representing the success/failure at every non-zero level of the system. We demonstrate how to reduce these latter maps to conventional Karnaugh maps (CKMs) of much smaller sizes. Various characterizations are inter-related, and also related to pertinent concepts such as shellability of threshold systems, and also to characterizations via minimal upper vectors or via maximal lower vectors.
Highlights
Two of the most fruitful and successful paradigms of system reliability modeling are those of the multi-state model (Barlow and Wu, 1978; Boedigheimer and Kapur, 1994; El-Neweihi et al, 1978; Griffith, 1980; Hudson and Kapur, 1983; Janan, 1985; Kumar and Singh, 2018; Lisnianski and Levitin, 2003; Mo et al, 2015; Ram, 2013; Tian et al, 2008; Wood, 1985), and the threshold model (Rushdi, 1990; Rushdi and Alturki, 2015, 2018; Rushdi and Bjaili, 2016), known as the weighted k-out-of-n model (Eryilmaz, 2015; Li et al, 2016; Eryilmaz and Bozbulut, 2019; Salehi et al, 2019)
This paper dealt with the reliability characterization and analysis of a homogeneous multi-state coherent threshold system of (m + 1) states, which is a non-repairable system with independent non-identical components
The paper presents switching-algebraic expressions of both system success and system failure at each non-zero level. These expressions are given as minimal sumof-products formulas or as probability–ready expressions
Summary
Two of the most fruitful and successful paradigms of system reliability modeling are those of the multi-state model (Barlow and Wu, 1978; Boedigheimer and Kapur, 1994; El-Neweihi et al, 1978; Griffith, 1980; Hudson and Kapur, 1983; Janan, 1985; Kumar and Singh, 2018; Lisnianski and Levitin, 2003; Mo et al, 2015; Ram, 2013; Tian et al, 2008; Wood, 1985), and the threshold model (Rushdi, 1990; Rushdi and Alturki, 2015, 2018; Rushdi and Bjaili, 2016), known as the weighted k-out-of-n model (Eryilmaz, 2015; Li et al, 2016; Eryilmaz and Bozbulut, 2019; Salehi et al, 2019). This paper is a serious attempt to unify the two models for the case of a coherent system with a well-defined binary image (Ansell and Bendell, 1987). This model of a multi-state coherent threshold system is very versatile, . This paper explores and inter-relates a variety of algebraic, map, and vector characterizations of this model, and explains how to evaluate its reliability via switching-algebraic techniques and tools used in the binary case (Rushdi and Goda, 1985; Rushdi and Abdulghani, 1993; Rushdi and Hassan, 2015, 2016)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: International Journal of Mathematical, Engineering and Management Sciences
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.