Abstract

Extended reliability and mechanical characterisation of Au and Pd-coated Cu (Cu) ball bonds are useful technical information for Au and Cu wire deployment in semiconductor device packaging. This paper discusses the influence of wire type on the package reliability and mechanical performance after several component reliability stress tests. Failure analysis has been conducted to identify the associated failure mechanisms of Au and Cu ball bonds after reliability tests. Wire pull strength and ball bond shear (with its break modes) of both wire types are investigated after unbiased highly accelerated temperature and humidity stress test (UHAST), temperature cycling (TC) and high temperature storage life test (HTSL) at various aging temperatures. Reliability Weibull plots have been plotted for each reliability stresses. Obviously Au ball bond is found with longer time-to-failure in Unbiased HAST stress compare to Cu ball bonds. Cu wire exhibits equivalent package and or better reliability margin compare to Au ball bonds in TC and HTSL tests. Failure mechanisms of UHAST and HTSL have been proposed and its mean-time-to failure (t50), characteristics life (t63.2, η) and shape parameter (s) have been discussed in this paper.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.