Abstract
In this article the author responds to the comments of Schriesheim, Bannister and Money on his article and reassess the implications of certain measurement properties of the Least Preferred Co-worker (LPC) scale. The author notes that in his review he concluded that the high internal consistency of LPC has been demonstrated. He adds that, since the writing his review, five additional coefficients of internal consistency have become available. As he indicated in his initial review, the literature provides no examples of parallel form reliability as the term is usually used. As noted correctly by Schriesheim et al., alternate forms of LPC meeting the criteria of true equivalent forms have never been developed or tested.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
