Abstract
Objective To analyze the reliability and validity of Chinese Version of Perinatal Grief Scale (PGS) in abnormal pregnant women. Methods After translating the original scale, we applied the back translation and cultural adaptation. Totals of 170 prenatal loss women were surveyed to analyze the item and exploratory factors. Another 110 cases were surveyed to do confirmatory factor analysis and reliability analysis. Results Except for the fifth item, the remaining 32 items and the correlation coefficient of total scale were higher (r=0.307-0.659). Two factors were extracted from exploratory factors analysis, accounting for a cumulative variance contribution rate of 60.82%. The results of confirmatory factor analysis were χ2/df=2.21, RMSEA=0.058, NFI=0.910, GFI=0.900, CFI=0.920. Conclusions The Chinese Version of PGS had good reliability and validity, and it is suitable for psychological assessment of abnormal pregnant women. Key words: Abnormal pregnancy; Perinatal grief scale; Reliability; Validity
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
