Abstract

PurposeAbnormal torsion could be associated with cyclovertical strabismus, but torsion measurements are not reliable in children. To assess an objective fundus torsion evaluation in a paediatric population, we used Non-Mydriatic Fundus photography (NMFP) in healthy and cyclovertical strabismus patients to evaluate the disc-foveal angle over time and observers.MethodsWe used a retrospective set of NMFP including 24 A or V-pattern strabismus and 27 age-matched normal children (mean age 6.4 and 6.7 years respectively), taken during 2 distinct follow-up consultations (separated by 251 and 479 days respectively). Each disc-foveal angle measurement (from which the ocular torsion can be assessed) was performed by 5 different observers, using graphical software and based on reproducible fundus anatomical marks. Statistical analysis was performed with a multivariate ANOVA using group, time and observers as factors, in addition to intraclass coefficient correlation (ICC) to assess measurement reproducibility.ResultsA significant difference of disc-foveal angle measures was observed between groups (p<0,001): 18.73° (SD = 6.42), -3,25° (SD = 5.51) and 6,89° (SD = 4,41) respectively for V-pattern, A- pattern and normal subjects. Neither observers (F = 0,2028 p = 0,9369) nor time between 1st and 2nd NMFP (F = 0,6312 p = 0,4271) seem to influence the measure of disc-foveal angle. The evaluation of disc-foveal angle was very reproducible between observers (ICC>0,97).ConclusionAbnormal amount of objective torsion could be associated with alphabet-pattern strabismus. Disc-foveal angle evaluation by NMFP in a children population appears as a non-invasive, reliable and reproducible method.

Highlights

  • Measuring cyclotorsion in everyday strabismological practice is a useful tool, used since 1840

  • The evaluation of disc-foveal angle was very reproducible between observers (ICC>0,97)

  • Abnormal amount of objective torsion could be associated with alphabet-pattern strabismus

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Measuring cyclotorsion in everyday strabismological practice is a useful tool, used since 1840. In order to assess cyclotorsion, several subjective methods have been described. Torsion can be assessed using Krats torches during a coordimetric Lancaster red-green test, with Harms’ tangent scale, with Bagolini’s striated glass or the double Maddox rod [6,7]. All of these tests require a normal binocularity and a perfect cooperation of the subject. They are not reliable in case of abnormal retinal correspondence or severe amblyopia. There is a subjective sensory adaptation to fundus torsion with time, if the cyclotorsion appears early during childhood [8]

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call