Reliability and accuracy analysis of time-weighted average exposure to heavy metals based on personal exposure

Abstract

Time-weighted average (TWA) exposure has been used as a surrogate for personal air exposure in some large-scale studies. However, the uncertainties of TWA exposure remain to be determined, although its boundedness has been widely recognized. This study aims to evaluate the reliability and accuracy of TWA exposure based on personal exposure. A total of 180 combined indoor-outdoor-personal air samples were collected of six cities during the non-heating and heating periods. The personal exposure levels of Hg, As, Cd, and Pb were 0.16, 21.20, 0.74, and 34.47 ng/m3 in the non-heating period, respectively, but were 0.20, 34.53, 3.45, and 18.59 ng/m3 in the heating period, respectively. The ratios of TWA and personal exposure of heavy metal(loid)s ranged from 0.91 to 1.53. Indoor pollution was the most significant factor of TWA exposure, accounting for 78.3–97.6% and 88.4–98.6% in the heating and non-heating period, respectively. Based on the results of redundancy analysis and risk assessment by TWA exposure, we concluded that TWA exposure could be used for qualitative investigation, as a substitute for personal exposure, but it may result in large bias when used for quantitative investigation. Larger sample size and more exposure scenarios can reduce the estimation error of TWA.