Abstract
Time-weighted average (TWA) exposure has been used as a surrogate for personal air exposure in some large-scale studies. However, the uncertainties of TWA exposure remain to be determined, although its boundedness has been widely recognized. This study aims to evaluate the reliability and accuracy of TWA exposure based on personal exposure. A total of 180 combined indoor-outdoor-personal air samples were collected of six cities during the non-heating and heating periods. The personal exposure levels of Hg, As, Cd, and Pb were 0.16, 21.20, 0.74, and 34.47 ng/m3 in the non-heating period, respectively, but were 0.20, 34.53, 3.45, and 18.59 ng/m3 in the heating period, respectively. The ratios of TWA and personal exposure of heavy metal(loid)s ranged from 0.91 to 1.53. Indoor pollution was the most significant factor of TWA exposure, accounting for 78.3–97.6% and 88.4–98.6% in the heating and non-heating period, respectively. Based on the results of redundancy analysis and risk assessment by TWA exposure, we concluded that TWA exposure could be used for qualitative investigation, as a substitute for personal exposure, but it may result in large bias when used for quantitative investigation. Larger sample size and more exposure scenarios can reduce the estimation error of TWA.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.