Abstract

Different methods for the estimation of fiber reinforced polymer (FRP) contribution to shear strength in reinforced concrete (RC) beams were evaluated and compared through reliability analysis using FRP rupture and debonding failure functions. The carbon fibers properties were obtained through laboratory tests allowing to define the probability distribution function of the fiber tensile strength and elastic modulus. Uncertainties associated with the load, material properties were taken into account in order to compare two standards (ACI 440.2R and CNR-DT200) and two more sophisticated methods proposed in the literature. The Monte Carlo method and an improved first order reliability method (FORM iHLRF) were used to determine the structural reliability of an RC beam with externally bonded FRP. The results show the effects of the different mechanical methods in the reliability indices of the strengthened RC beam. The performance function related to FRP rupture presented a much higher reliability index than the other failure function related to FRP debonding for all four methods. A reliability-based design optimization was also performed to measure the effects of the assumptions and uncertainties associated with each method regarding the design variable (width of the reinforcement) for the same target reliability. The most conservative methods were the standards (ACI 440.2R and CNR-DT200), leading to a wider FRP reinforcement than the ones estimated by the other methods for the same reliability safe level design.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call