Reliability, Accuracy, and Time Efficiency of Digital vs. Analog Bite Registration Technique

Abstract

Prosthodontic rehabilitation hinges upon establishing an accurate and stable occlusal relationship, making accurate bite registration paramount. This process ensures optimal oral function, mastication, and speech, while also contributing to the longevity of prostheses and enhancing aesthetic outcomes. Various bite registration techniques are available, including analog methods like wax and silicone, and digital methods enabled by intraoral scanning and advanced software. The choice between these techniques depends on factors such as clinical scenarios and practitioner preferences. While both analog and digital techniques have their advantages and considerations, digital methods often offer enhanced precision, real-time visualization, and patient comfort. Reliability, accuracy, and time efficiency are crucial factors in the selection of a technique, with digital methods generally excelling in these aspects. However, the ultimate reliability of any technique is contingent on the practitioner's expertise, material quality, and adherence to best practices. In summary, the choice of bite registration technique in prosthodontics should align with patient needs, clinical context, and the practitioner's skill set.