Abstract

Decisions regarding microbial risk assessment usually have to be carried out with incomplete information. This is due to the large number of possible scenarios and the lack of specific data for the problem considered. Consequently, risk assessment studies are based on the information obtained with a small number of bacterial cells which are considered the most heat resistant and/or more capable of multiplying during storage. The identification of the most resistant strains is usually based on D and z-values, normally estimated from isothermal experiments. This procedure omits the potential effect that the shape of the dynamic thermal profile applied in industry has on the microbial inactivation. One example of such effects is stress acclimation, which is related to a physiological response of the cells during sub-lethal treatments that increases their resistance. In this article, we use a recently published mathematical model to compare the development of thermal resistance for Escherichia coli K12 MG1655 and E. coli CECT 515 using inactivation data already published for these strains. Based only on the isothermal experiments, E. coli K12 MG1655 would be identified as more resistant to the thermal treatment than the CECT 515 strain in the 50–65°C temperature range. However, we conclude that stress acclimation is strain (and/or media)-dependent; the CECT 515 strain has a higher capacity for developing a stress acclimation than K12 MG1655 (300% increase of the D-value for CECT 515, 50% for K12 MG1655). It, thus, has the potential to be more resistant to the thermal treatment than the K12 MG1655 strain for some conditions allowing acclimation. A methodology is proposed to identify for which conditions this may be the case. After calibrating the model parameters representing acclimation using real experimental data, the applicability of the proposed approach is demonstrated using numerical simulations, showing how the CECT 515 strain can be more resistant for some heating profiles. Consequently, the most resistant bacterial strain to a dynamic heating profile should not be identified based only on isothermal experiments (D- and z-value). The relevance of stress acclimation for the treatment studied should also be evaluated.

Highlights

  • Microbiological risk assessment tries to estimate the probability that the consumer of a food product contracts a sickness due to the presence of a pathogen in the product above a critical concentration (Allende et al, 2018)

  • We explore how stress acclimation may be relevant for microbial risk assessment, studying how it can influence the choice of the most resistant bacterial strain to a particular thermal treatment

  • Garre et al (2018) observed for dynamic heating profiles with a heating rate higher than 15◦C/min stress acclimation was irrelevant for E. coli CECT 515

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Microbiological risk assessment tries to estimate the probability that the consumer of a food product contracts a sickness due to the presence of a pathogen in the product above a critical concentration (Allende et al, 2018). Several studies have pointed out the variability in the bacterial response of different strains when exposed to similar conditions, expressed by different values of the model parameters characterizing the microbial response (Nauta, 2000; Hassani et al, 2006; van Asselt and Zwietering, 2006; Bruschi et al, 2017). This is an issue for microbial risk assessment, due to the large number of different microbial strains that can potentially contaminate a good product. It is limited to some bacterial strains identified as the most resistant ones and/or the ones with the highest growth potential

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call