Abstract
We find that the adjustments to net income resulting from mandatory 2005 adoption of IFRS in Europe are relevant to investors in financial as well as non-financial firms. However, we find differences in value relevance of the aggregate net income adjustment and adjustments relating to several individual IFRS standards for these two types of firms and across major country groups, which suggests that differences in institutional features or domestic standards can affect investors’ assessment of the relevance of IFRS accounting amounts. Despite these differences, we find that investors in all firms, except French/German non-financial firms, view net income measured in accordance with IAS 39 Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement as more value relevant than net income measured in accordance with domestic standards, which is notable because IAS 39 was highly controversial in Europe.
Submitted Version
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
